It was entirely predictable, yet why did it take so long? The Leader of the council, and the lead member for children’s services have both resigned today over the Baby P tragedy. It was far too long in coming, and has only happened due to public pressure and the insistence of their own party colleague, Secretary of State Ed Balls.
The x-leader, George Meehan, has said it was a matter of “personal honour and responsibility” - yet why did it take so long? Only seven days ago, Labour wouldn’t even allow a vote to take place on their removal. With 16 months elapsed since the tragedy, there is far less honour than there should have been.
And where does this leave our system of child protection, both in Haringey and nationwide? We have already had a serious case review in Haringey over the death of Baby P. Was it a sham, or just a shambles? It mst have been one or the other, given that a fresh one has been ordered by Ed Balls today.
Have we had to endure 16 months in which the lessons of this tragedy have not been learned? In the three meetings I attended with Liz Santry and top officials to discuss Baby P, this was always a prime concern. I remember, at one of them, using the word ‘whitewash’ when referring to the serious case review process. This prompted the usual indignant denial, which seems to ring very hollow today.
As Lynne Featherstone, who has done so much to articulate public outrage over this issue, said today, more than ever, we need a full public inquiry to get to the bottom of these issues. How was Haringey able to string along so many agencies for such a long time? How can the Government remotely believe such a question doesn’t need a comprehensive answer? It does, and it must happen.
So what next for the Labour council? After nearly 40 years in power, there is a palpable feeling that their time is now up. Yet who from Labour will take over, and lead the borough out of this disaster? Most of those manoeuvring for position couldn’t remotely do the job. The only person who is even vaguely capable of doing so is the current deputy leader. Yet she is most comfortable in the bizarre modern language of the public sector, with its talk of ‘enabling’ and ‘place-shaping’ that local people will rightly fail to understand.
There will be the usual talk of ‘medium term delivery of a sustainable community through partnership working to achieve key performance indicators,’ and so on. But will it make any difference?
It’s a grim day, but at least we can now start the work to rebuild the reputation of the council and the whole area.
And for any officials who are found to have grossly failed, just three words apply.
Not one penny.
…